The idea of random isotropic surface structures seems attractive at first. Something simple, elegant, and maybe even something easy to apply to a ski. Imagine a surface finish on a ski that could be sprayed on! Perhaps smooth indentations on the ski base from a shot-peen gun, or cuts from an abrasive sandblasting apparatus. That seems simple and relatively inexpensive. But would it work?
Golf balls travel through the air, spinning, without a set orientation to the travel direction (imagine having to line up the golf ball just so on the tee...!). Additionally, the axis of spin can translate while the ball is flying through the air. So a non-directional isotropic arrangement of the dimples is best.
|Angled pattern, but the structure elements are |
all aligned length-wise.
Note that while skating there is typically a bit of torsional force and movement of the ski in the snow. Additionally, skate skis usually slide through less transformed snow than a ski in a set (classic) track. So skate skis and classic skis are sometimes treated differently.
The skate ski structures are tending toward broken patterns, which have easier separation and less stickiness in the ski release. Long, straight, continuous linear structures with continuous frets tend to track well but have a stickier release or separation from the snow. Broken structures with linear elements, but with angled interference patterns are proving to work very well on both skate and classic skis.
So, skis don't get the simple isotropic base structures, but rely on lengthwise oriented patterns. The ski structure designs utilize depth, spacing, orientation, and pattern to optimize the ski speed through the snow in various conditions.